One third of employer actively discriminate, reveals CIPD

-

New research jointly commissioned by Chartered Institute of Personnel and Development (CIPD) and KPMG reveals a startling picture of employer bias towards disadvantaged groups. Less than one in four employers have hired from disadvantaged groups, such as ex offenders, young people with no qualifications and the long term unemployed during the last three years.

The survey also reveals that when employers were asked to rate these groups in terms of performance with other employees, employers rated their performance generally equal to that of other employees. The report concludes that there is an unfair negative attitude towards these groups and more needs to be done by government to help overcome barriers.

Around one third (32%) of employers actively exclude certain disadvantaged groups from the recruitment process. Although this is an improvement from 2005 when a similar CIPD survey found that 62% of employers excluded one or more disadvantaged groups from the recruitment process, however it still represents a wide section of the workforce being actively excluded.

Nearly one fifth (19%) of employers will not even consider applications from ex-offenders, 16% of employers exclude young people aged 18 and under with few or no qualifications and 9% of organisations exclude applications from people aged over 65 or older.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Commenting on the findings Gerwyn Davies, CIPD Public Policy Adviser, said:

“The extent of exclusion is not in every case justified on the basis of the potential of almost every target group. For example, employers with experience of employing ex-offenders consider them at least as productive as other workers and a majority of employers consider them to be more loyal than the rest of the workforce. This would suggest that people with criminal records and individuals from other target groups are in many cases being unfairly excluded from the recruitment process. More must be done therefore by policy makers, working with employers, to challenge these often inaccurate and negative stereotypes.”

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

The hidden impact of remote working on your employees’ wellbeing

Paul Rhodes explores the lesser known mental and physical effects of remote working.

Stephen Smith: In the eye of the ‘perfect storm’

A brief look back at some of the events...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you