<

!Google ads have two elements of code. This is the 'header' code. There will be another short tag of code that is placed whereever you want the ads to appear. These tags are generated in the Google DFP ad manager. Go to Ad Units = Tags. If you update the code, you need to replace both elements.> <! Prime Home Page Banner (usually shows to right of logo) It's managed in the Extra Theme Options section*> <! 728x90_1_home_hrreview - This can be turned off if needed - it shows at the top of the content, but under the header menu. It's managed in the Extra Theme Options section * > <! 728x90_2_home_hrreview - shows in the main homepage content section. Might be 1st or 2nd ad depending if the one above is turned off. Managed from the home page layout* > <! 728x90_3_home_hrreview - shows in the main homepage content section. Might be 2nd or 3rd ad depending if the one above is turned off. Managed from the home page layout* > <! Footer - 970x250_large_footerboard_hrreview. It's managed in the Extra Theme Options section* > <! MPU1 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! MPU2 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! MPU - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section3* > <! MPU4 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! Sidebar_large_1 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! Sidebar_large_2 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! Sidebar_large_3 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! Sidebar_large_4 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! Sidebar_large_5 are not currently being used - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! Bombora simple version of script - not inlcuding Google Analytics code* >

Government’s market-led approach will undermine localism agenda

-

A new report published Tuesday 31st July, by unions and voluntary sector groups highlights potential flaws in the government’s localism agenda, as outlined in the Localism Act.

Jointly produced by the TUC and National Coalition for Independent Action (NCIA), Localism: Threat or opportunity? includes articles from a range of diverse voices from the union and voluntary sector including the TUC, Adur Voluntary Action, Age UK, the National Association for Voluntary and Community Action (NAVCA), the NCIA, the Northampton Institute of Urban Affairs, the Runnymede Trust, Shelter and the Women’s Resource Centre.

The report reveals that while many in the voluntary sector are keen to see more engagement between public service providers and local community organisations, the government’s determination to create competitive markets for public services and a failure to understand collective and community approaches to public service provision could seriously undermine this relationship.

New powers within the Localism Act, such as the Community Right to Challenge, come under particularly scrutiny in the report. The TUC and voluntary organisations fear that the Right to Challenge, which allows local non-profit groups to bid to run public services, will simply open up competition for services to the benefit of large private sector outsourcing companies.

Other concerns raised in Localism: Threat or opportunity? include the lack of capacity within certain communities and voluntary organisations to buy local assets or produce neighbourhood plans. The report fears that this will simply empower those in the community with the loudest voices, the most resources and the sharpest elbows to influence local decision-making.

TUC General Secretary Brendan Barber said: ‘Everybody wants to see public services that are responsive to local need, and where service users and staff are given a genuinely powerful voice in local decision-making.

‘But the government’s preoccupation with the power of market competition and outsourcing means that the big winners from the Localism Act will be private sector contractors, who will see the local not-for-profit groups as either ‘bid candy’ or cheap sub-contractors for delivering the service contracts that they hoover up.’

Andy Benson from NCIA said: ‘The government’s Localism Act has been heralded as a shift of power from central government back into the hands of individuals, communities and councils.

‘However, in reality the main effect of the Act will be to hasten the privatisation of vital public and community services. This report aims to expose the reality behind the rhetoric, and provide the means for local communities and voluntary services to look this particular gift horse in the mouth.’

Latest news

Noisy and stuffy offices linked to lost productivity and retention concerns

UK employers are losing more than 330 million working hours each year due to office noise, poor air quality and inadequate workplace conditions.

Turning Workforce Data into Real Insight: A practical session for HR leaders

HR teams are being asked to deliver greater impact with fewer resources. This practical session is designed to help you move beyond instinct and start using workforce data to make faster, smarter decisions that drive real business results.

Bethany Cann of Specsavers

A working day balancing early talent strategy, university partnerships and family life at the international opticians retailer.

Workplace silence leaving staff afraid to raise mistakes

Almost half of UK workers feel unable to raise concerns or mistakes at work, with new research warning that workplace silence is damaging productivity.
- Advertisement -

Managers’ biggest fears? ‘Confrontation and redundancies’

Survey of UK managers reveals fear of confrontation and redundancies, with many lacking training to handle difficult workplace situations.

Mike Bond: Redefining talent – and prioritising the creative mindset

Not too long ago, the most prized CVs boasted MBAs, consulting pedigrees and an impressive record of traditional experience. Now, things are different.

Must read

James Herbert: Time for an awkward conversation?

"It’s hard to know what’s really going on in workers’ lives."

Jonathan Taylor: People with disabilities need more help at work

Employers need to take responsibility for the needs of their employees, writes Jonathan Taylor; the onus shouldn't always be on the employee asking the manager for help.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you

Exit mobile version