Almost 70% of Brits want the retirement age to be lowered, new study shows

-

A recent survey conducted by Investing Reviews has shed light on the prevailing sentiment among Brits concerning retirement age and pension provisions.

The study, which gathered insights from over 2,000 participants, revealed that a significant portion of respondents believes that retiring comfortably in the United Kingdom is becoming increasingly difficult. Notably, a staggering 78 percent of those surveyed advocated for a reduction in the retirement age.

With concerns mounting over the pension landscape, 70 percent of respondents expressed the belief that achieving a comfortable retirement in today’s UK is more challenging than ever before.

These sentiments align with the ongoing tensions in France, where protests and discontent have erupted due to the proposed increase in the retirement age from 62 to 64. The UK’s sentiments toward retirement age appear to mirror those of the French population.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Relocation?

Remarkably, the survey indicated that a substantial proportion of respondents are willing to relocate for their retirement, with 42 percent of Brits expressing a preference for living abroad. The notion of seeking retirement outside the UK raises questions about the country’s rising inflation rates and the cost of living, which might be hindering retirees’ ability to sustain their desired lifestyle.

While the majority of respondents (68.71%) advocated for a lower retirement age, the study also highlighted other concerns related to pensions. Over 60 percent of participants expressed doubts about their pension’s adequacy for a comfortable retirement. A significant portion of respondents (55.82%) indicated that they faced limitations in making contributions to their pension funds as desired, which might be contributing to these concerns.

The survey also delved into sentiments about employer contributions to pensions. Surprisingly, more than 40 percent of respondents indicated a willingness to switch to entirely different career sectors if it meant enjoying higher employer pension contributions. The study drew attention to the disparities in pension contributions across sectors, with the ‘public administration and defence’ industry standing out for its relatively higher employer contributions compared to sectors like ‘wholesale and retail trade.’

Uncertainty surrounds pension funds

Another concerning aspect revealed by the survey is the uncertainty many individuals have about their pension funds. Over a third of participants confessed to not having a clear understanding of their pension’s value. This uncertainty aligns with the sentiment of nearly 35 percent of respondents who believed they would not be able to retire comfortably in the UK.

Commenting on the findings, Simon Jones, CEO of Investing Reviews, stated, “These responses offer a fascinating insight into the attitudes that the British public hold towards pensions and retirement ages, particularly the sentiment that it is now harder to retire comfortably than ever before.” Jones also pointed out that recent events, such as the backlash against retirement age increases in France and the challenges posed by the cost-of-living crisis, could impact these sentiments in the future.

The survey data provides a comprehensive view of public opinion on retirement and pensions, reflecting concerns about the current state of retirement provisions in the UK and indicating a desire for policy changes that would allow individuals to retire earlier and more comfortably.

 

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Christina Morton: Pimlico Plumbers – Legal battle for workers’ rights continues at the Supreme Court

The announcement last week of Pimlico Plumbers' decision to appeal to the Supreme Court over the employment status of one of its plumbers, Mr Smith, was widely expected, not least because of extensively publicised comments made by Pimlico Plumbers founder, Charlie Mullins, to the effect that the Court of Appeal reached the wrong decision in the case.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you