Clarks accused of covering strike using agency workers

-

The union Community has stated they are investigating “wrongdoing” after Clarks allegedly utilised agency workers to cover a strike.

Clarks, a shoe retailer, has come under fire after allegedly covering a strike using agency workers.

Staff in a Clarks warehouse in Somerset began the strike in October after the company announced a fire and rehire policy with staff claiming this would leave them with “worse money and conditions”.

A spokesperson for the company explained Clarks’ decision:

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Westway [in Somerset] has a two-tier workforce with staff doing the same jobs working side by side on different rates of pay and terms.

Those employed many years ago have significantly better terms than their colleagues which is unsustainable for us.

However, Community have since reported one particular instance to the Department for Business, Energy and Industrial Strategy (BEIS), stating the agency worker was hired as a general worker but was seen driving a forklift – a duty typically carried out by a Clarks worker on strike.

Under the Conduct of Employment Agencies and Employment Businesses Regulations 2003, companies are not allowed to hire temporary workers to perform duties normally carried out by workers on strike.

In a statement, a spokesperson for Clarks denied this, stating:

Right throughout this period of industrial action, Clarks has been acting according to the law. Clarks is not using agency workers to cover employees who are on strike.

Clarks continues to be in regular communication with Community and since the start Clarks has offered to make details of agency worker numbers available to them to provide reassurance.

However, Community has maintained it will “[continue] to investigate further wrongdoing and will appeal this with the relevant agencies wherever it may be found.”

Neil Carberry, Chief Executive of the Recruitment & Employment Confederation, commented on the case:

Using agency workers to break a strike is illegal.

No client of a recruitment agency should be asking them to break the law by supplying workers for this purpose.

Agencies should be careful to do their due diligence as they always would, and the REC’s legal services are available to help members if they have suspicions.

But ultimately it is the client’s responsibility to ensure they and the agency workers they engage are not breaking the law.

Monica Sharma is an English Literature graduate from the University of Warwick. As Editor for HRreview, her particular interests in HR include issues concerning diversity, employment law and wellbeing in the workplace. Alongside this, she has written for student publications in both England and Canada. Monica has also presented her academic work concerning the relationship between legal systems, sexual harassment and racism at a university conference at the University of Western Ontario, Canada.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Stephen Smith: Winning the battle for business continuity

In one of the more positive results to come...

Anne-Marie Balfour: Election proposals for future employment law

A breakdown of how each party's policy will affect HR.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you