Can employers decline employee’s annual leave requests?

-

With the school summer holidays fast approaching, now is the time when people’s minds turn to planning their holidays. For employers, managing employee leave requests can be a headache – even more so than usual in a year which includes the World Cup in Russia. Employers may find themselves understaffed and struggle to keep their businesses running as usual. So if it all becomes too much and business is being affected can employers decline annual leave requests?

Under the Working Time Regulations 1998, all workers are entitled to a minimum of 5.6 weeks’ paid annual leave determined by their normal working week. Employees place great significance on their annual leave entitlement and the act of declining an employee’s annual leave request can often be seen as a negative act.

It is a common misconception that employees can take annual leave whenever they want, however, employers can decline annual leave requests where they have a business reason to do so. An annual leave policy is a useful way of setting out clear guidelines on booking holiday to encourage staff to follow the correct procedures and provide employers with the appropriate framework to decline holiday requests which fail to comply with the policy.

At BrightHR, our people management software system has recorded a 32% increase in the number of declined holiday requests in 2018 from employers. Employers often place a cap on how many employees from each department are able to take annual leave at the same time to ensure service levels are maintained, with this being more important in smaller departments where there are fewer members of staff to cover workplace duties. Where the cap is reached, employers can decline any annual leave requests which would place the department over the cap. Employers may consider some flexibility, especially during more popular holiday times, by allowing a small overlap of one to two days however there is no requirement to do so.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Many employers will also have rules regarding the maximum length of annual leave that can be taken at one time to prevent staff having long periods of absence from work. This is typically a maximum of 2 weeks of continuous leave from work, with any requests in excess of two weeks being declined. Employers may decide to approve requests for longer periods of annual leave under certain circumstances, however doing so may create an expectation from employees that these requests will be approved in the future.

Additionally, seasonal restrictions may also be enforced to prevent employees from taking annual leave during certain times of the year, for example, during the lead up to Christmas. Where the annual leave policy states leave cannot be taken during a certain period, any holiday request which falls within this period can be declined.

Although employers may reject annual leave requests under certain circumstances, employees must be permitted to take their minimum leave entitlement as failure to reasonably allow this could result in costly tribunal claims. Therefore, employers should encourage staff to take annual leave wherever possible and line managers should discuss holiday schedules with their teams to highlight suitable periods where leave may be taken.

To avoid having to decline annual leave requests, employers can make staff aware of the holiday leave policy and the rules set out within this. Periodic reminders, and speaking to staff about their holidays, will encourage staff to make requests for periods where they are permitted to take leave, helping to avoid disappointment.

Alastair is a Chief Technological Officer at BrightHR.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Russell Kenrick: Moving stakeholder engagement higher up the HR priority list

HR professionals will agree that stakeholder engagement is key to securing a successful change initiative or project outcome. Yet in the real world too many projects continue to fail.

Robert Leeming: Are internships making the UK’s creative industry a middle class only affair?

An honest day’s pay for an honest day’s work. That has always been the adage that has kept the wheels of capitalism turning for generations. If you mentioned the notion of working for free to anyone from an older generation, they would find the idea abhorrent. They would slam the notion as exploitation, as not the way that things are supposed to work. And they would be right.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you