Harassment – why brushing it under the (red) carpet is not good enough

-

“Maybe I’ve just been lucky…” says Karen Plumbley-Jones, practice development lawyer at Bond Dickinson LLP.

Maybe I’ve just been lucky, or maybe it’s because I’ve spent the last 27 years employed by law firms with good working environments, but I’ve never been harassed at work.

According to two surveys published on 25 October, one carried out by ComRes for BBC Radio 5 on sexual harassment in the workplace and the other conducted by Opinium Research into workplace culture, my experience may not be typical: between a fifth and half of British women have experienced sexual harassment in the workplace. Released the week after numerous sexual harassment and assault allegations started to surface against Harvey Weinstein, the US film producer and former film studio executive, I should not perhaps be shocked by the extent of the problem revealed by these reports. However, two things struck me as alarming on reading the survey results:

1. The reluctance of victims to report incidents to their employer – two-thirds of the women who experienced harassment and nearly 80% of the men took no action; and

2. The failure of employers to take allegations seriously, with one-third of incidents not being followed up and nearly a fifth not even being acknowledged.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Employers are liable for acts of sexual and other harassment carried out by their employees in the course of their employment. The potential compensation is unlimited and the figures can be eye-watering; just two years ago, a woman who worked for a Russian bank was awarded nearly £3.2 million by an employment tribunal after she was bullied and sexually harassed by her manager. What happened to the manager? No action was taken against him and he continued to work for the bank for a year. When he eventually left, he received a payoff of £168,000. These sorts of figures do not take into account the reputational damage that a large claim can wreak or the legal fees and management time that have to be spent on defending a claim.

The number of sex discrimination claims declined sharply from July 2013, when employment tribunal fees were introduced and an individual had to pay £1,200 in order to bring a claim and get it to a hearing. However, fees were abolished by the Supreme Court in July 2017 and we may start to see a rise in claims as a result.

Employers have a defence to a claim if they can show that they took “all reasonable steps” to prevent the harassment taking place. This means much more than just having an anti-harassment policy; employers need to train all staff (including senior managers) on the types of behaviour that are unacceptable, what happens if they breach the policy, and what to do if they are a victim of harassment or harassment is reported to them. The organisation needs to create a culture where harassment is not tolerated and staff can speak out if they are harassed or witness a colleague being harassed. It may be stating the obvious but managers need to take all allegations seriously, which means carrying out a full investigation and taking action against the perpetrator if the allegation is upheld.

I thought that the bad old days of managers either tolerating an employee’s harassing behaviour because “we can’t afford to lose him”, or giving the harasser a generous settlement agreement in order to persuade him to go quietly, were in the past. Sadly, it seems that I was wrong.

Karen is a practice development lawyer at Bond Dickinson LLP, specialising in employment law. She has more than 20 years' experience of advising employers and employees. She is responsible for ensuring that the employment team is kept fully up-to-date with relevant legislation and case law, updating our precedent bank, editing our weekly employment briefings, writing training and seminars for clients, updating our timeline and key facts sheet and maintaining our Twitter account.

Karen writes and delivers seminars and training for clients, including our regular employment clubs. She has spoken at CIPD events and has taught employment law to solicitors for Central Law Training. She has had articles published in various legal and HR journals and is a member of the Employment Lawyers’ Association.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Tim Povtak: Occupational Hazards – Risk of Asbestos Exposure

The use of asbestos in America has been reduced...

Darren Spevick: Bringing social media on board

In March of this year, Glaxo Smith Kline (GSK)...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you