<

!Google ads have two elements of code. This is the 'header' code. There will be another short tag of code that is placed whereever you want the ads to appear. These tags are generated in the Google DFP ad manager. Go to Ad Units = Tags. If you update the code, you need to replace both elements.> <! Prime Home Page Banner (usually shows to right of logo) It's managed in the Extra Theme Options section*> <! 728x90_1_home_hrreview - This can be turned off if needed - it shows at the top of the content, but under the header menu. It's managed in the Extra Theme Options section * > <! 728x90_2_home_hrreview - shows in the main homepage content section. Might be 1st or 2nd ad depending if the one above is turned off. Managed from the home page layout* > <! 728x90_3_home_hrreview - shows in the main homepage content section. Might be 2nd or 3rd ad depending if the one above is turned off. Managed from the home page layout* > <! Footer - 970x250_large_footerboard_hrreview. It's managed in the Extra Theme Options section* > <! MPU1 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! MPU2 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! MPU - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section3* > <! MPU4 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! Sidebar_large_1 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! Sidebar_large_2 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! Sidebar_large_3 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! Sidebar_large_4 - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! Sidebar_large_5 are not currently being used - It's managed in the Widgets-sidebar section* > <! Bombora simple version of script - not inlcuding Google Analytics code* >

Eleanor Rogers: Strike season and childcare – how to come out on top

-

shutterstock_57670474

The latest tube strike may have been called off, but there is another strike planned just around the corner. This time, teachers plan to walk out on 26 March over pay, pensions and conditions. They blame Michael Gove’s persistent refusal to address their complaints.

In the past we have seen that teachers’ strikes can be potentially more disruptive than strikes in other unionised workplaces. In June 2011, teachers and civil servants in the UK took strike action and reportedly, many employers suffered from the fall out, as some working parents were unable to make alternative childcare arrangements. This resulted in parents missing work to stay at home and look after their children. So, how should employers treat staff who need to take time off to care for their children or deal with unexpected leave?

As with any unforeseen circumstances, a degree of flexibility and common sense is required on both sides if employers and their employees are to limit the disruption.

If alternative child care arrangements cannot be made, in most cases employers would be ill-advised to refuse a working parent the day off. This is because employed parents have the statutory right to reasonable unpaid time off to care for dependants when there has been an unexpected disruption or breakdown of child care arrangements and the leave is necessary to deal with that disruption of breakdown of arrangements. The right also applies if the child is ill, injured, dies or is involved in an unexpected incident at school. The right only applies to employees – irrespective of their length of service, or whether they work full-time or part-time or are employed on a permanent, temporary or fixed-term basis. It does not apply to workers or the self-employed. The amount of time off that the employee can take is limited to the amount of time which is needed to deal with the “crisis”.  Employees should give their employers notice of the reason for the absence as soon as reasonably practicable and let them know how long they expect to be away from work, otherwise the statutory right does not apply.

In this instance we have been given good notice of the strike, so couldn’t we argue that it was not unexpected?

Unfortunately not. In a case with Royal Bank of Scotland Plc and its employee, the EAT (employment appeals tribunal) considered whether there was an “unexpected” disruption to child-care arrangements when an employee had two weeks’ notice that her child minder would be unavailable. The EAT confirmed that the word “unexpected” does not involve a time element – it is unexpected at the moment the employee learns of it. In this case, the employee took reasonable steps to find alternative care, but failed, so the leave was necessary. Had she not taken reasonable steps, then the employer could have argued that the time off was not necessary and therefore did not fall within the definition and she was not entitled to time off.

Working parents should not suffer a detriment (such as disciplinary action for being absent) for exercising their statutory right. In a different case with Credit Resource Solutions, an employment tribunal found that the employee was subjected to a detriment when he had one hour’s pay deducted, even though he was only away for half an hour to make emergency childcare arrangements. He was also unfairly dismissed, as this was linked to his exercising his statutory rights. The case highlights the need for policies to be implemented carefully, so that decision makers and managers have a clear understanding of them and can then use them effectively and fairly.  In another case with Npower Ltd, its employee was awarded £1,000 when she was subjected to first stage disciplinary action for having taken time off under the company’s leave policy.

To limit the disruption further strike action may bring, consider the following:

  • Consider your dependant leave policies – are they up to date, sufficiently clear and fit for purpose
  • Make sure that all involved are aware of their rights and obligations under the dependant leave policies
  • Inform your workforce of planned strikes, so that they can start to make childcare arrangements
  • Ensure that the policy is enforced equally for all employees.

Eleanor Rogers is an employment lawyer at UK’s largest employment law firm, Doyle Clayton. For further advice contact Eleanor Rogers on 020 7329 9090 or at erogers@doyleclayton.co.uk

Latest news

Turning Workforce Data into Real Insight: A practical session for HR leaders

HR teams are being asked to deliver greater impact with fewer resources. This practical session is designed to help you move beyond instinct and start using workforce data to make faster, smarter decisions that drive real business results.

Bethany Cann of Specsavers

A working day balancing early talent strategy, university partnerships and family life at the international opticians retailer.

Workplace silence leaving staff afraid to raise mistakes

Almost half of UK workers feel unable to raise concerns or mistakes at work, with new research warning that workplace silence is damaging productivity.

Managers’ biggest fears? ‘Confrontation and redundancies’

Survey of UK managers reveals fear of confrontation and redundancies, with many lacking training to handle difficult workplace situations.
- Advertisement -

Mike Bond: Redefining talent – and prioritising the creative mindset

Not too long ago, the most prized CVs boasted MBAs, consulting pedigrees and an impressive record of traditional experience. Now, things are different.

UK loses ground in global remote work rankings

Connectivity gaps across the UK risk weakening the country’s appeal to remote workers and internationally mobile talent.

Must read

Kelly Sayers: Closer to the heart

Many companies now have nepotism policies in place to...

Hannah Robbins: Accommodating religion in dress codes at work

The way we choose to look and dress is seen as a way of expressing our personalities and beliefs. In the UK we have a lot of freedom around what we can wear in public but the issue around workplace dress codes, specifically in reference to religious beliefs, remains a controversial and difficult area to navigate.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you

Exit mobile version