Maggie Berry:How collective responsibility can create a better working environment

-

I was recently surprised to read statistics claiming that more than two fifths of men would ‘prefer’ to work in an environment of ‘just male employees’ while only 8% of the men think a women-only office would be ideal for them.

According to HR consultancy Reabur, who conducted the online poll, 64% of men who wanted to work in an all-male workplace put this down to a ‘bitchy environment’ created by ‘some female colleagues’.

These statistics, if accurate, are somewhat disheartening. It’s a real shame to see that a large proportion of men buy into outmoded stereotypes, not to mention the cliche that a female-dominated office is “bitchy”. It is true to say that there can be tension among competing women in the workplace, but this can also be said of a male attitude to work. This can be indicative of a double standard that’s unfairly placed on women in some industries.

Perhaps more depressingly, of the respondents who stated that they would like to be the only man among female employees, the majority, 68%, said this was down to potential ‘romantic opportunities’ and 11% attributed this to there being ‘less competition’ where female professionals were concerned.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The most alarming statistic, however, is that the majority of female respondents (59%), said that they would prefer work in male-dominated workplace. Of this figure, 34% believed this would “reduce the bitchy environment” apparently created by women.

While the proportion of women who felt this way was significantly lower than men, it’s still unfortunate that, given the potential for support and collaboration between female professionals, so many are put off by the notion that women are “bitchy” or “hostile”.

In the course of my career, I’ve had the good fortune to attend an extremely high number of networking events for women. At these functions I’ve met countless female professionals who have been the polar opposite of “bitchy” or “hostile”. In fact, they have attended solely to support, and be supported by, other women in their careers.

In fact, there are many organisations, Women in Technology included, that have been set up specifically to facilitate this kind of female, professional support and bonding. The stigma of “bitchiness” that has been applied to competitive women must be addressed and removed if there is going to be progress towards gender equality in the workplace – and you only have to attend a women’s networking session to experience this in action.

Outside of these events, there are many ways to highlight how employees, regardless of gender, are collectively responsible for their company culture. If there is a hostile working environment, then company directors need to liaise with HR to see if there’s anything in the corporate values or in the example they set that facilitates this atmosphere. If so, this needs to be addressed and boundaries need to be set from the top down. Team-building activities can also help to break the ice and ease tensions in a difficult situation. They can also help each member of staff to gain a better perspective on their individual contributions to the workplace and can help to counter gender stereotypes.

Statistics of this nature are helpful in understanding the challenges that female professionals face in their careers. While they may seem disheartening, they cut straight to the core of the issue and, in a way, reveal a way forward in creating a better working environment for everyone – and more opportunities for women.

About Maggie Berry

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Stuart Branch: How Weetabix has closed the gender pay gap in the past year

"We want to attract and nurture the top talent and we know that creating a fair, empowering and inclusive workplace culture supports this goal."

Florence Parot: To burnout, or to not burnout, that is the question

I left you in my last article with the burning question (pun intended) of how to detect the signs of potential burnout. As I mentioned last time, once in burnout, it takes 12 months to recover enough to be able to get back to work so this is no idle question. If detected beforehand, it is not just the person’s life that could feel a lot different but the whole bottom line of the company that will be affected, especially if that person is key personnel.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you