Emilie Bennetts and Kate Bunn: Paternity leave rights

-

Speculation is rife as to the name, gender and title of the Royal baby, however one thing is certain, that for the first time in history, it will have equal rights to the throne whether it is male or female. With the hope of mirroring this move towards equality, a new system of shared parental leave has been put forward by the Government, and it is anticipated that these changes will come into force in 2015.

Like 9 out of 10 new fathers, Prince William is expected to take two weeks’ ordinary paternity leave (OPL) from his job. The vast majority of new fathers do not, however, take any additional paternity leave (APL), which is available if the mother is entitled to statutory maternity or adoption leave and has returned to work. The TUC believes that less than 1% of fathers took APL in 2011/2012.

What is APL and why aren’t more men taking it?

OPL gives an eligible employee the right to take one or two consecutive weeks of leave within 56 days of the child’s birth. APL gives an employee the right to one period of additional consecutive leave. It can last between 2 and 26 weeks and must start 20 weeks after, and end 12 months after the birth or placement for adoption. The mother of the child must have returned to work.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Employees are only eligible to be paid during APL if the mother returns to work with an unused statutory pay period. For example, if the mother returns to work after week 35 of her maternity leave and the father takes APL, only 4 weeks of the APL will be paid, being the balance of the statutory maternity pay period.

The TUC believes that more men are not taking advantage of APL because it is usually paid at the statutory rate (currently £136.78) and is rarely topped up by employers. It is, however, paid at the same rate as the majority of the maternity leave period and therefore the reason for the low take-up is not necessarily only financial. It is possible that men are put off by the perceived negative impact of taking a career break while their partner goes back to work. In addition, the concept of APL is a new one: it only applies to parents of a baby due on or after 3 April 2011 and the available figures therefore relate only to the first year of implementation.

Will the new legislation change anything?

APL will be abolished and replaced with a new system of shared parental leave in 2015.

The precise administrative details of shared parental leave have yet to be confirmed, but the new legislation attempts to afford greater flexibility to parents. An eligible mother will continue to receive 52 weeks’ maternity leave but apart from the first 2 weeks, which will be a compulsory period, she can choose to end her leave early and share the remainder of her leave with her partner, or the couple can decide to take the leave concurrently, as long as they don’t exceed the 52 weeks. Statutory shared parental pay will be available to those who are eligible. It is hoped that by sharing the responsibility of childcare it will strengthen the family unit and begin to break down certain stereotypes.

The purpose of the new legislation is to make it easier for parents to choose to share childcare responsibilities. Given the very low take-up of the APL regime, we will need to wait and see what impact these changes will have.

Managing paternity leave

• To be eligible for OPL/APL, an employee must satisfy certain conditions including length of service; relationship to the child/mother; and duty of responsibility for the child.

• The employee must give written notice to the employer of their intention to take OPL/APL, including details of the Expected Week of Childbirth, the length of the OPL/APL, and the date of starting their OPL/APL.

• During the OPL/APL, employees are entitled to the same terms and conditions as stated in their employment contract, except those relating to remuneration. The employee’s continuity of service is not interrupted.

• An employee usually has the right to return to the same job in which they were employed immediately prior to taking the leave. If certain conditions apply, the employer is entitled to propose an alternative job to the employee which is suitable and appropriate to them in the circumstances, which cannot be on less favourable terms and conditions than those which would have applied had the employee not taken OPL/APL.

Issues to consider in reviewing your paternity policy

• A paternity leave policy should be gender neutral because paternity leave can be taken by employees of either sex, provided they satisfy the eligibility requirements.

• Review contractual terms and policies to ensure that payment terms during OPL and APL are clear.

• If you enhance maternity benefits above the statutory minimum, consider whether to provide similarly enhanced paternity benefits. Consider taking legal advice on this point as it is likely that employees will challenge those employers who choose not to treat employees on maternity and paternity leave equally.

• Implement a separate policy for parents adopting children as these rights vary slightly.

Emilie Bennetts is an Associate and Kate Bunn is a Trainee Solicitor at Charles Russell LLP

Kate Bunn is a legal professional specializing in business law, contract drafting, and policy creation. Based in Exeter, England, she operates K&K Legal Consulting Ltd, where she provides direct, transparent legal advice with a focus on client needs. Her professional approach emphasizes no-fluff communication and peace of mind for her clients. She holds credentials from CILEX Law School and has established a substantial professional network with over 980 LinkedIn followers and 500+ connections, indicating significant experience and recognition in the legal consulting field.

Latest news

Lucy Standing: Older workers are back in the centre of the hiring debate – ready to lead the response?

For HR leaders, the argument is simple: the people being filtered out of your hiring process are not past their best.

One in 10 women quit work after pregnancy loss, report finds

Research suggests inconsistent workplace support following pregnancy loss and maternity leave is contributing to resignations and poorer mental wellbeing.

Fear of becoming obsolete grips workers as AI reshapes careers

More than two in five workers worry their skills could become outdated as AI reshapes hiring demands and increases pressure to keep learning.

Ford rehires 350 engineers after AI fails to deliver

Carmaker says veteran engineers have helped improve quality, mentor younger staff and retrain AI systems after automated checks fell short.
- Advertisement -

Low harassment reporting may hide workplace misconduct, employers warned

Low workplace harassment reporting rates may reflect a lack of trust in reporting systems rather than an absence of misconduct, new research suggests.

Jennifer Liston-Smith joins Halo Workplace Nurseries board

HRreview columnist Jennifer Liston-Smith has joined Halo Workplace Nurseries as chief purpose officer to help develop its workplace nursery compliance platform.

Must read

Sue Brooks: HR lessons from Wimbledon – Murray goes for diversity

The issue of diversity in the sporting world has...

Sam Sprules: Why employers need to wise up to the shift in power in recruitment

Aviation has long been one of those industries that many people aspire to be part of.  Up there with Hollywood, aviation is glamorised by its promise of international jet-setting travel.
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you