Retail giant put customers at risk

-

Sentencing has taken place of Marks and Spencer plc and 3 of its contractors following convictions in July for putting members of the public, staff and construction workers at risk of exposure to asbestos-containing materials.

The prosecutions stemmed from the poor manner in which refurbishment work was carried out at stores in Reading and Bournemouth during 2006 and 2007.
Examining the safety failings, it became clear to HSE that Marks and Spencer did not allocate sufficient time and space for the removal of the asbestos-containing materials at the Reading store. The contractors had to work overnight in enclosures and finish before the shop opened to the public each day. Although the company had its own guidance on how asbestos should be removed inside its stores, this guidance was followed by contractors “inappropriately” during major refurbishment.
At the Bournemouth project the principal contractor failed to plan, manage and monitor removal of asbestos-containing materials. It did not prevent the possibility of asbestos being disturbed by its workers in areas that had not been surveyed extensively.

Marks and Spencer plc of North Wharf Road, Westminster, was found guilty of breaching S.2(1) and 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act 1974, and at Bournemouth Crown Court it was fined £1 million and ordered to pay costs of £600,000. These failings relate to work at its Broad Street, Reading, store from 24th April 2006 to 13th November 2006.

Contractor Willmott Dixon Construction Ltd was found guilty of contravening the same sections of the Act during February 2007 and and was fined £50,000 plus costs of £75,000, the failures related to a store in Commercial Road, Bournemouth. It is applying for permission to appeal against conviction.
PA Realisations Ltd (formerly Pectel Ltd) of Chapel Walks, Manchester, was found guilty of contravening r.15 of the Control of Asbestos at Work Regulations 2002 between May and November 2006 at the Marks and Spencer plc store in Reading, it was fined £200, the company now awaits dissolution.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Styles & Wood Limited of Altrincham, Cheshire, admitted breaching S2(1) and 3(1) of the Health and Safety at Work etc Act
1974, these offences were committed between April and November 2006 at the Reading store. It was fined £100,000 with costs of £40,000.
Another company, Clarence Contractors Ltd of Sheffield, now in liquidation, was fined a total of £200 with £100 costs after it pleaded guilty to breaching r.10 and r.15 of the Control of Asbestos at Work Regulations 2002. These offences were committed between September 2004 and September 2006 at a store in Plymouth. It also pleaded guilty to contravening r.11 and r.16 of the Control of Asbestos Regulations 2006 at the Bournemouth store. The offence under r.11 took place between February and July 2007, the offence under r.16 occurred during February and March 2007.

PA Realisations Ltd had not reduced to a minimum the spread of asbestos at Reading, areas cleaned were re-contaminated by air moving through the void between the ceiling tiles and the floor above and by poor standards of work.

Styles & Wood Limited admitted that it should not have permitted a method of asbestos removal which did not allow for adequate sealing of the ceiling void, and which resulted in risks to contractors on site.

An HSE official commented: “Large retailers and other organisations who carry out major refurbishment works must give contractors enough time and space within the store to carry out the works safely. Where this is not done, and construction workers and the public are put at
risk, HSE will not hesitate in taking robust enforcement action.

Latest news

Transgender staff excluded from single-sex toilets under new equality guidance

Transgender people must be excluded from single-sex toilets and changing rooms that correspond with their lived gender under updated...

Simon Coker: Closing the emotional gap – why AI in the workplace is as much a human challenge as a technological one

AI adoption is transforming how work gets done across every sector. But its deeper impact is less visible: it is reshaping how people feel about their work.

Employment tribunal delays stretch towards 2030 as lawyers warn system is nearing collapse

Employment tribunal hearings are being delayed for years as lawyers warn mounting backlogs are undermining workplace justice.

Keeping culture and purpose at the centre of a growing fintech

A fintech people leader explains how culture, wellbeing and purpose are being protected during rapid business growth.
- Advertisement -

Migrant worker with no right to work in UK wins discrimination case against employer

An employment tribunal has ruled that a migrant worker without the legal right to work in Britain can still pursue successful discrimination claims.

Government to replace some GP sick notes with return-to-work plans

Workers in four English regions will be directed towards personalised health and employment support as ministers test alternatives to GP-issued fit notes.

Must read

Eleanor Bradley: An online portfolio is the graduate’s best friend

Finishing university can be a daunting time for young...

Erica Sosna: Why Employee Engagement is Key

It might sound ‘soft’ but employee engagement offers a...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you