Jobseekers often ignored by welfare firms for being “too costly”

-

News published by the Guardian  has shown that welfare firms admit to focusing on job seekers that are more likely to generate a fee and are ready to work, ignoring vulnerable jobless clients that require more investment and that are considered as “too costly” to help.

The research into flagship coalition initiative, revealed that the quality of services offered to job seekers is being affected by the way the Work Programme was designed, in which companies are not paid until customers have been in work for two years, creating a huge financial stress that many providers have no option but to prioritise on “easy customers” that are more likely to generate a fee.

Despite concerns over the Work Programme, the government has announced plans to use a similar payment by results system as it prepares to introduce market reforms to the probation service.

In addition, the study revealed a widespread concern that the “payment by results” approach has been undermining ministers’ stated aim of getting “hard to reach” customers, such as those with disabilities, off benefits and into work.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

The study is based on a series of interviews with welfare providers of all sizes, both private companies and charities and focus groups conducted by the Third Sector Research Centre at Birmingham University.

Latest news

Sustainable business starts with people, not HR policies

Why long-term success depends on supporting employees, not just meeting ESG targets, with practical steps for leaders to build healthier organisations.

Hiring steadies but Gulf crisis threatens recovery in UK jobs market

UK hiring shows signs of stabilising, but rising global uncertainty linked to the Gulf crisis is weighing on employer confidence and delaying recovery.

Women ‘face career setback’ risk with flexible working

Female staff using remote or reduced-hour arrangements more likely to move into lower-status roles, raising concerns about bias in career progression.

Jo Kansagra: Make work benefits work for Gen Z

Gen Z employees are entering the workforce at full steam, and yet many workplace benefits schemes are firmly stuck in the past.
- Advertisement -

Union access plans risk straining workplace relations, CIPD warns

Proposed rules on workplace access raise concerns about employer readiness and operational strain.

Petra Wilton on managers struggling with new workplace laws

“Managers are not being given the tools they need to fully understand how the rules of the workplace are changing.”

Must read

Scott Gregory: Do recruiters really want a transformational leader?

Is there a difference between charismatic leadership and transformational leadership?

5 myths about digital recruitment

The fast-changing world of apps, social media, video technologies, games and VR is having a dramatic impact on HR processes.  How can we use digital recruitment to our advantage?
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you