Parents and carers call for overhaul of employment support

-

In a powerful display of unity, more than 100 parents and carers have joined forces to demand significant changes to the government’s benefits system, urging the scrapping of punitive measures and a stronger focus on breaking down barriers to employment.

Under the banner of the “Changing Realities” project, this initiative is funded by the abrdn Financial Fairness Trust.

It brings together individuals who have lived experience with the benefits system, collaborating with the University of York and the Institute for Public Policy Research (IPPR) to highlight system flaws and propose viable solutions.

Voices from the affected community have expressed their frustration with the current state of affairs. One single parent, Herbie, dismissed the notion that Universal Credit effectively assists people into better employment, calling it “nonsense.”

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

Another parent, Precious D, shared her personal struggles, stating that she did not receive any meaningful employment support.

The lack of effective support is a common concern

A common concern voiced by claimants was the lack of effective support from Work Coaches. Dotty G, a single parent, revealed her frustration with the inconsistency of assistance, saying, “I don’t believe that Work Coaches understand our individual circumstances, because it seems as if I see a different Work Coach whenever I have an appointment.”

This criticism comes despite the government’s initial promise that Universal Credit would pave the way for more individuals to find and progress in suitable employment.

Rather than doubling down on punitive measures within the existing system, the group is advocating for a comprehensive overhaul of the benefits framework that offers genuine support to those seeking employment.

Their proposed recommendations include:

  1. Improving the adequacy of the social security system by increasing all benefits, eliminating the five-week wait for Universal Credit, and abolishing the two-child limit and the benefit cap.
  2. Transforming Universal Credit to make it more adaptable by exploring flexible assessment periods, incentivizing work by expanding work allowances, and providing financial assistance to claimants in their job search.
  3. Shifting the focus from sanctions to substantial support and mentorship, removing the fear of punitive measures.
  4. Establishing consistent case workers to provide regular, reliable points of contact and personalized assistance.
  5. Creating a statement of rights for claimants to balance the relationship between rights and responsibilities.
  6. Enhancing access to skills training while taking individual skills and career aspirations into consideration.

Melanie Wilkes, associate director at IPPR, emphasized that while not everyone can work, there are millions of people let down by the current benefits system who genuinely want to find employment or work more hours. She urged the government to reevaluate its approach to employment support if it aims to genuinely help people advance their careers.

Dr. Ruth Patrick, a senior lecturer at the University of York, stressed the urgent need to reform the failing employment support system, moving away from conditionality and sanctions. She highlighted the importance of prioritizing long-term, meaningful employment for individuals based on their unique circumstances and expertise, arguing that the recommendations put forth by claimants themselves could serve as a promising starting point in rebuilding an inclusive and effective employment support system for everyone.

Amelia Brand is the Editor for HRreview, and host of the HR in Review podcast series. With a Master’s degree in Legal and Political Theory, her particular interests within HR include employment law, DE&I, and wellbeing within the workplace. Prior to working with HRreview, Amelia was Sub-Editor of a magazine, and Editor of the Environmental Justice Project at University College London, writing and overseeing articles into UCL’s weekly newsletter. Her previous academic work has focused on philosophy, politics and law, with a special focus on how artificial intelligence will feature in the future.

Latest news

Personalising the Benefits Experience: Why Employees Need More Than Just Information

This article explores how organisations can move beyond passive, one-size-fits-all communication to deliver relevant, timely, and simplified benefits experiences that reflect employee needs and life stages.

Grant Wyatt: When the love dies – when staying is riskier than quitting

When people fall out of love with their employer, or feel their employer has fallen out of love with them, what follows is rarely a clean exit.

£30bn pension savings window opens for employers ahead of 2029 reforms

UK employers could unlock billions in National Insurance savings by expanding pension salary sacrifice schemes before new limits take effect in 2029.

Expat jobs ‘fail early as costs hit $79,000 per worker’

International assignments are ending early due to family strain, isolation and poor preparation, as rising costs increase pressure on employers.
- Advertisement -

The Great Employer Divide: What the evidence shows about employers that back parents and carers — and those that don’t

Understand the growing divide between organisations that effectively support working parents and carers — and those that don’t. This session shows how to turn employee experience data into a clear business case, linking care-related pressures to performance, retention and workforce stability.

Scott Mills exit puts spotlight on risk of ‘news vacuum’ in high-profile dismissals

Sudden departure of a long-serving BBC presenter raises questions about how employers manage high-profile dismissals and limit speculation.

Must read

Jon Andrews: The difference between millennials and other generations is technology

It is true that the workplace is set to...

Chris Welford: The Myth of Productivity

You might already be contemplating your New Year’s Resolutions...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you