Government to give employers the power to have ‘frank discussions’ with staff

-

The government is planning on introducing new rules which are designed to give employers the power to have “frank discussions” with staff without fear of facing workplace discrimination claims.

This will include talks on underperformance as well as discussions over whether or not an employee should consider retirement.

The plans were announced by deputy prime minister Nick Clegg as he visited a hi-tech firm in Shoreditch, London, this week.

He said that business secretary Vince Cable will be announcing new employment law proposals which will include the introduction of “protected conversations”.

Get our essential weekday HR news and updates.

This field is for validation purposes and should be left unchanged.
Keep up with the latest in HR...
This field is hidden when viewing the form
This field is hidden when viewing the form
Optin_date
This field is hidden when viewing the form

 

“Employers tell us they’re afraid to have frank discussions with staff … for fear of those exchanges being used against them unfairly, should a dispute end up at tribunal,” said Mr Clegg.

“We want to give them the confidence to be open about performance, about retirement with their employees. If you speak to many employers, they value older workers massively. I don’t think there is some sort of in-built prejudice against older workers at all.”

However, some have argued that the changes, which come alongside a raft of measures introduced by the government with the aim of cutting red tape for businesses, will make it easier for employers to get away with discrimination in the workplace.

“It would give a licence to bad employers to bully and intimidate staff,” commented TUC general secretary Brendan Barber.

Meanwhile, Mr Clegg said the government will also be looking at ways to cut down the number of workplace inspections conducted by organisations such as the Health and Safety Executive, suggesting a limit of two inspections a year for small businesses.

“This is another example of the government putting the right to make a fast buck before our health and safety and our lives,” argued Mr Barber.

“Regulation is there to protect us all from businesses that rip us off, trash our environment, and risk our health – or even our lives.”

Latest news

Transgender staff excluded from single-sex toilets under new equality guidance

Transgender people must be excluded from single-sex toilets and changing rooms that correspond with their lived gender under updated...

Simon Coker: Closing the emotional gap – why AI in the workplace is as much a human challenge as a technological one

AI adoption is transforming how work gets done across every sector. But its deeper impact is less visible: it is reshaping how people feel about their work.

Employment tribunal delays stretch towards 2030 as lawyers warn system is nearing collapse

Employment tribunal hearings are being delayed for years as lawyers warn mounting backlogs are undermining workplace justice.

Keeping culture and purpose at the centre of a growing fintech

A fintech people leader explains how culture, wellbeing and purpose are being protected during rapid business growth.
- Advertisement -

Migrant worker with no right to work in UK wins discrimination case against employer

An employment tribunal has ruled that a migrant worker without the legal right to work in Britain can still pursue successful discrimination claims.

Government to replace some GP sick notes with return-to-work plans

Workers in four English regions will be directed towards personalised health and employment support as ministers test alternatives to GP-issued fit notes.

Must read

Iain Mcmath: Higher prices

A recent survey by the Daycare Trust revealed that...

Gordon Calder-Jones: Using salary sacrifice to fund company cars

Company cars were once the sole preserve of senior...
- Advertisement -

You might also likeRELATED
Recommended to you